Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Spuzz Date: Aug 30, 2004 9:30am
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: The quality of discussion

I might as well mention this here...

The key words here are 'watch films' before writing reviews, because I have increasingly noticed that Cashel's reviews for a film came from screenshots, and not watching the whole film, for example, his review of 'Sailing Along'
http://www.archive.org/movies/details-db.php?collection=prelinger&collectionid=SailingAlong

If you read the review, then look at the screenshots, you'll realize my point.

Sorry if I am appearing nitpicky, but reviewing films like this is like a professional critic reviewing films based on the press kit.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Lewis Payne Date: Aug 30, 2004 10:55am
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: The quality of discussion

I HATE the idea of people posting reviews of any kind without seeing the film first. I hope he does not make a habit of this.